|
It's been many years since I last stood for the national anthem. At baseball games I just sit there drinking my beer as everyone else rises. At a concert on the courthouse lawn in the Arizona town where my grandmother lives, when my girlfriend didn't stand for the anthem, my grandmother - a wonderful woman, who I love dearly - asked with a bit of concern, "don't you love America?"
But it goes much deeper for me, at least, than a mere rejection of jingoism. I don't consider myself an "American." I don't buy into national identities. If you held a gun to my head and made me choose, I'd claim to be a Californian, never an American.
It's not that I dislike other Americans, though there are many who I cannot stand. It's that I believe the process by which we as humans separate ourselves by creating supposedly essential identities - be they racial, cultural, religious, or political - is not just flawed, but corrosive.
We create hard and fast identities usually to lay claim to power. We do this by defining ourselves as "us" and others who we wish to disempower as "them." We have many ways of accomplishing this - dissing on others' cultural habits, trying to use the law to classify 12 million people as "illegal" and therefore without rights, etc.
But this act of differentiation always brings consequences, especially when dealing with the formation of national identities. Some people are "in" and therefore privileged, others are "out" and therefore disempowered and free to have all sorts of violence visited upon them. Sure, we have classifications and tiers of other nationalities, often based on race, but that doesn't change the overall dynamic.
When I have traveled around the world, I have noticed both the similarities and the differences between myself and others. But they are still human beings, fundamentally like me. Why does it suit me to then claim a national identity that serves to separate me from them?
No, I think it is ultimately necessary during this century to abandon national identities in favor of a human identity, in order to create the sort of global political movement that is essential to the reconstruction of our freedoms and economic security.
This doesn't mean I shun my past. America is my home, where I was born, and where I will probably always live. I don't dislike this place. I'm happy in the U.S., though many things need to change. But I don't want to claim an identity that separates me from the other 5.7 billion humans. I will always have American cultural traits, but I'd prefer those to be seen as variations on a theme rather than markers of inherent difference.
I'm not alone in questioning an American identity, but I suspect most of you are more willing to embrace it - instead, you wish to change what "American" means. Perhaps you want to return to, and improve upon, a late 20th century definition that sees "American" as egalitarian, inclusive, democratic, peaceful. Maybe you believe your Americanness is cheapened by the current forms of patriotism and jingoism and want to reclaim, or create, a better version.
My objection to "American" runs deeper, but I don't object to others feeling differently.
And so comes today's question:
Do you consider yourself an American?
If so, why? If why, why not? For those of you who do not currently live in, or who have never lived in, the U.S., do you embrace another national identity (French? Chinese? Canadian?) or do you reject them utterly?
|